this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
1539 points (99.7% liked)

Science Memes

17825 readers
2318 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt text: They're up there with coral islands, lightning, and caterpillars turning into butterflies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JeromeVancouver@lemmy.ca 110 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Which is why a 13 month calendar all having 28 days would have made more sense

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It makes 12 months because the lap the Earth makes is deducted from the 13 the moon makes, so effectively it makes 12 cycles around the Earth.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

You don't know what you're talking about

13x28=364. The moon makes 14 sidereal orbits, not 13. The reason the year is split into 12 months is a combination of Roman dipshittery and the fact that 12 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, and 6. The number of factors of 12 made 12 and 60 way easier to work with for societies that hadn't invented the decimal point yet.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Then please explain how the Hebrew calendar, and all other lunisolar calendars (calendars which follow both the solar year and the lunar cycle) have 12 months most years? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunisolar_calendar

"The majority of years have twelve months but every second or third year is an embolismic year, which adds a thirteenth intercalary, embolismic, or leap month."

[–] stray@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not who you asked, but after looking into it it's because the moon takes about 29.5 days to complete a full cycle of phases (one synodic month), giving it time to do so roughly 12 times per year.

I can't quite wrap my head around it, but I think the explanation for why sidereal and synodic months differ lines up with your initial explanation. Because we're also moving, the moon has to move further to achieve the visual change of moon phases.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks. I think the user who replied to me is the one with no idea that they're talking about. No way of measuring it comes close to 14.

[–] stray@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can you provide a source for 14 orbits? Everything in my search results says 13 and some change.

Wikipedia says one sidereal month is 27.321661 days and a sidereal year is 365.256 days.

365.256/27.321661 ≈ 13.37

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

a sidereal year is 365.256 days.

No. A sidereal year is 366.24 days.

And 11 days isn't "and some change"

[–] stray@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago

The figures in my post are ephemeris days since that's the way Wikipedia lists them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidereal_year

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_month#Sidereal_month

"And some change" is a phrase to refer to a number following a decimal point, meaning the sources I find claim there are thirteen point something sidereal months per year, at a figure too low to round to 14. Here are some example sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbit_of_the_Moon#Lunar_periods

http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=1126

I still can't find a source which says the moon makes 14 sidereal orbits per year, using any definition of year.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago (2 children)

12 is an easier number to work with because of how many factors it has

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago (5 children)

hmm, how about 12 months each with 30 days, plus 5 days every year that's not part of any month?

[–] teft@piefed.social 39 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

5 days every year that’s not part of any month

Those are called intercalary months. They had them in the ancient egyptian calendar (5 every year, 6 in leap years) and were usually used for rest and religious ceremonies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercalary_month_(Egypt)

[–] Microw@piefed.zip 22 points 4 days ago

I'm pretty sure they're being cheeky and we're referencing exactly this ;)

[–] rImITywR@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The year starts with Hammer and ends with Nightal.

Whereas my year starts with Hammer and ends with Fall.

plus 5 days every year that's not part of any month?

Get this Roman bullshit outta here

[–] Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

plus 5 days every year that's not part of any month?

Just add a leap month every six years

You'd have 12 30-day months most years, and an extra in the sixth! While we're at it, we can redefine a week to be six days, so there's a perfectly rounded number of weeks per month/year! Days, hours, minutes and seconds are already fine, but maybe we should also replace units shorter than a second with something more dozenal/hexal(?), too…

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

While a novel idea, a leap month would throw the concept seasons and therefore agriculture off significantly. Relatively predictable seasons and being able to track our place in it with calendars was a great help to agrarian communities, helping them know when to plant and harvest most effectively.

[–] stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Only if you measured agriculture by the calendar instead of other signs.

For example: Hesiod's Works and Days, a Greek poem about farming and right living from about 800 BC, includes a poetic agricultural calendar that has nothing to do with months - plough your fields when the cranes are migrating and the Pleiades are no longer visible over the horizon, harvest when the Pleiades appear again; cut wood for tools when Sirius is high in the sky; prune grape vines sixty days after the solstice; etc.

So the calendar could say whatever it wanted. Farmers - who were generally illiterate anyway - knew when to plant and harvest without it.

Fun fact: the earliest Roman calendars had only ten months, 305 days, from March to December. The days between December and March didn't belong to any month and could be as many as the Romans wanted to make March start appropriately in spring.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Every 7 or 6 years for a leap week 12 month calendar, it would be four times longer for a leap month, and the formula is a bit too complex for people to do in their heads, but we all refer to computer calendars anyway

A 364 day calendar with 13 even months, or 12 months alternating between 35 and 28 days or whatever would also let you use the same calendar every year (as opposed to my tea towel that has a calendar that is only useful in leap years that start on a Tuesday — the last was 2008 when it was bought, next is 2036)

Though it would be too expensive to change the calendar, and a 364 + leap weeks calendar doesn't track the seasons as well as 365 + leap day calendar, I really like the symmetry 454 calendar

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

13*28=364 so even 13 months and 28 days doesn't work.

If we had 28 days in a month then the week needs to be something other than 7 days. Three out of four times February / March fucks me over by having the same weekday/ day of the month.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

There is a calendar that uses 28, 35, 28 day months each quarter for 364 days, with the last quarter having an extra week (or having an intercalary week so they can pretend quarters will be all equal) in leap years

Only for pre-decimal society. Nowadays it's not a problem

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Landlords would love it, at least. I personally would hate it, being a renter.

[–] JeromeVancouver@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago

Haha great point. I never thought of that

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Your rent right now can be thought of as a large payment split into 12 equal pieces (even though months aren’t actually equal) and your rent payment is just 1/12 of that. If there were 13 months it would just be split into 1/13 so each months payments would be slightly smaller to be the same total

If we transitioned it would take years and for at least some amount of time of overlap they would show both prices so it would be much harder for them to just jack up the price like they would prefer to do

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't worry, they ain't ever gonna replace the Gregorian calendar.

It's a shame, though. That Jeromian 13 month one sounds like a better fit, whether or not you're in Vancouver!

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago

Landlords would love it, at least.

And I thought you ment because the pubs would be full that week :-(

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

13 is a unlucky superstition number.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Only in Western cultures. In East Asia, it’s 4.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They have a different calendar too, no?

Nope, theirs is also the same. Just another same than ours.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In China, it's 8 due to the number sounding like the Mandarin word for death

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

In my understanding, 4 sounds like the word for death and 8 sounds like the word for wealth, so 8 is considered lucky.

But I don’t speak any version of Chinese, and could very well be wrong.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Didn’t some cultures do that?