this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
80 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

579 readers
525 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
Lyudmila@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
ButtBidet@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
80
[CW: Transphobic slur] Guy discovers he's pansexual, blames porn for giving him a "fetish" (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by BeamBrain@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net
NSFW 56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The paper that this is from is the product of a group headed by a self-described "pro-life feminist" and that has retweeted TERFs.

It always sucks when groups with legitimate criticisms of pornography (or anything) dip into bigoted, reactionary bullshit because it poisons whatever valid points they may have made.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 11 points 6 days ago

Oh hey look, they're repackaging the "Gays targeting kids to turn them gay" thing again.

[–] Tommasi@hexbear.net 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)

penis and ejaculation fetish

How deviant. Only decades of exposure to violent pornography could explain this.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

This poor man is being exposed to the twisted modern sexual fetishes of thousands of years ago

CW decadent smut

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 52 points 1 week ago

"exposure to violent pornography"

doesn't describe any violent pornography

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I used to joink my doink right-handed, like Baby Jesus Intelligently Designed me to do. now that I have watched violent pornography for a decade, I learned to doink-joink with my left hand and really enjoy busting, this inviting the devil into my home.

I wish I had never discovered the sears lingerie catalogue.

[–] Pentacat@hexbear.net 37 points 1 week ago

Sinister.

[–] 9to5@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

If you bust with your left you bust with the devil

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

penis and ejaculation fetish

Uhhh... is there a thing that's plainer than vanilla?

Like cardboard, maybe?

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm a bit of a bar fly myself.

Yeah? What do you usually drink?

Water

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

It's not a fetish! It came free with the biology! Even if you're queer, that's like the first node in the roguelike

[–] ComradeSpahija@hexbear.net 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

That kind of reminds me of the paper where there's testimony from a man who feels wrong about the heart transplant that saved his life because he got a black man's heart. It is the purest combination of racism and ignorance I've ever seen.

Edit: Found the screenshots

The second quote is full to the brim with tagline material

[–] TheDeed@hexbear.net 11 points 6 days ago

I fucking hate white people

[–] WIIHAPPYFEW@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago

long lost south park plotline

[–] robotElder2@hexbear.net 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

'OH No! Big throbbing cock is hot! This is a disaster! Who has done this to me!' cardboard-monsters

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

Seeing the ol' monster dong pounding away is one of the like points of porn my dude.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not gay I just have a fetish for dudes fucking me in the ass

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 43 points 1 week ago

Early exposure to violent phonography desensitizes users, leading them to seeking out more violent, deviant and extreme genres.

Okay yeah that tracks.

One consumer described the impact:

(braces self for fucked up shit)

trans and gay porn

[–] Parzivus@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

groups with legitimate criticisms of pornography (or anything) dip into bigoted, reactionary bullshit

So what, all of them?
Seriously, the vast majority of these anti-pornography groups are evangelicals. The leader of this group is Melinda Reist, an Australian Baptist known for being an anti-abortion TERF. She also started Women's Forum Australia, an explicitly TERF organization that also promoted the dangers of WiFi signals. But people on this site will still happily parrot their talking points!

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

So what, all of them?

Every existing AES state either severely restricts or outright bans porn, while capitalist countries generally allow it. How do we reckon with this? If socialists in power all came to the same wrong conclusion about the evils of sexual imagery, why did they?

This is not me JAQing off. I legitimately do not know how to grapple with this question.

[–] 389aaa@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

It's rather simple: there is absolutely nothing in Marxist-Leninist or Maoist or whatever statist communist theory that actually requires them to be socially libertine in any way. You can implement Marxist-Leninist theory, for example, perfectly well while still being deeply socially conservative on issues that do not have to do with the general labour rights of the population - Feminism to some degree is required because that has to deal with rights to labour, and AES states need women to work for much the same reason Capitalist states need women to work, to increase productivity, and doing that generally requires confronting (to some degree) the sexism and misogyny of their population.

That does not require in any sense queer rights, sexual liberation, generally the right to live one's life in the way one wants so long as it is not harming others, etc - indeed, given the increased focus on the 'collective' and on the 'community' there is if anything even more incentive for these states to promote and push the social norms that already exist in the population, which have almost invariably been quite socially conservative and scornful of behavior that is seen as disgusting or outside-the-norm, as tends to be the case in most human cultures in general. Simple as that, in my opinion.

[–] WrongOnTheInternet@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

statist communist theory

Well that's a huge red flag

Maintenance of socially reactionary and conservative is incompatible with the stateless and classless objective of communism.

For the majority of their histories, pretty much all AES held a range of social norms that could be considered quite progressive until the recent supremacy of the west. But it would be an incorrect conclusion to think that certain feudal social structures for example were more socially progressive.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A Socialist society (in the Marxist conception) prioritizes societal harmony over personal freedom. Not to a total degree, but definitely more so than under Liberal Capitalism.

Participation in "vices" (pornography, gambling, drugs, sexual promiscuity, etc ) can be fine and fun in moderation. Hell, I partake in many of them, some of them to excess. But it's also true that any of them can become addictive; that they can disrupt work and family life, they can harm relationships. They can cause disharmony in society.

Within the West, we are drawn to these things as a rebellion against a society we oppose. But in a Socialist society, they can represent a rebellion against Socialist values.

It is a goal within a Socialist government to determine to what extent these things are beneficial to society, if at all. Dialectics should then be used to determine the best course of action to deal with each vice: removing the core disease for which that vice is a symptom; making life bearable without the vice; changing societal norms so that the vice no longer causes disharmony; or just penalizing it out of existence with strict laws.

[–] 389aaa@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This sort of socialism is somewhat repugnant to me, I will admit, as unpopular as an opinion as that likely is around here. I am only a Communist because I see it as the best path to maximizing individual freedom, something that so-called 'individualists' have repeatedly failed to actually prioritize - Capitalism just sells the aesthetic of 'individualism' while still keeping all but the richest of the rich in gold-painted chains.

Prioritizing 'societal harmony' over personal freedom is, in my experience, the sort of talk that leads to people like me being 'penalized out of existence', which is obviously not an outcome that is desirable to me. I am not interested in assimilation in any respect - I do not want to be beaten into shape by society, but allowed to be myself, regardless of how weird I am.

[–] Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm always reminded of the younger man in the documentary "Loyal Citizens of Pyeongyang in Seoul", who in his interview says that he left North Korea for China because he was a bit antisocial and just didn't fit in well with the DPRK's heavily conformist society. I have to sympathize with him because I'm the same sort of person, and I probably would have done the same thing in his shoes.

But his story to me does not read as a dystopia, but a tragedy - a better society is built that serves well the vast majority, but there are still those who - of not fault of their own - are unsuited for it. You can sympathize with the antisocial man while still recognizing the society is preferable on the whole; and you can recognize the society is preferable on the whole while still trying to improve it further.

[–] 389aaa@hexbear.net 4 points 6 days ago

I suppose I have higher expectations than simply something that works for the majority - in truth, I suspect that a society that is ideal for cishet nuerotypicals is literally incompatible with one that is ideal for queer nuerodivergent people. Being a queer nuerodivergent people myself, I naturally want to prioritize the well-being of my 'people', much as nuerotypical cishet people invariably prioritize the well-being of themselves as a group.

This is why I, in truth, think the only actual solution to this problem is separation and complete autonomy. Even then I am suspect of cishet nuerotypicals allowing such communities to exist - they will always have overwhelming economic power just by numbers alone, it would be very easy for them to acquire coercive control over such an enclave 'for our own good' even under, say, an anarchist system.

In truth, I don't really hope at all. It seems the fate of people like me to always be 'outside', regardless of the social organization of the majority - it's just a matter of exactly how bad it is.

[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I thought this was going to be a serious article on how exposure to violence at a young age messes you up.

Like I got exposed to violent videos at a young age, and youtube kept recommending it to me. It became a weird addiction. Eventually, I stopped, but I got as a result intrusive thoughts that are quite gory and detailed. it still doesn't go away (even with meds), and i don't know how to deal with them, even after years of not watching any gory content.

But yeah jerking off to trans and gay porn, the horror :/ ~/s~

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh no I just found out I enjoy more than one thing. I must repress those feelings and loudly proclaim society is broken for making me look inward for the first time since high school.

Damn you woke marxists!

[–] WeedReference420@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Getting sucked off by a dude

This is fucking Globalism's fault

(Obviously there are legitimate criticisms of porn as you say but some mfs will do anything but admit to being bi/pan goddamn)

[–] Riffraffintheroom@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

Globalism = Gobblejism

[–] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lmao penis fetish

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 6 days ago

battling in my head between "policing what people call themselves is cop shit" and "YOU'RE GAY! THAT'S WHAT GAY IS!"

[–] RiotDoll@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i used to think pornography was causing my kinks to spin out of control, back when the sex i had was non reciprocal oral sex and the rare (bad) hookup pre-transition

once I started having sex, and hoo boy - the first real sex i had was a three way - I learned that "i can crank one off to this" and "I am into this as a lived experience" are very different.

Reading this kind of thing just makes me think of the presumption that my pornographic interests were a near 1:1 map of my actual kinks

I think this guy is a bit silly lol. he looked at porn and basically made himself comfortable with his own urges and then freaked out and blamed the porn instead of his repression

[–] Des@hexbear.net 6 points 6 days ago

somehow like 90% of my partners both hook ups and relationships (mono or poly) were into similar kinks to me i was either seeing it out or get insanely lucky

but i get that feeling that's how i felt pre human contact but it was earlier internet era so at first I thought I was mentally damaged or something

[–] Biggay@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I always fail to understand what these people's fucking problem is. Maybe I just never had post ejaculation guilt but like, if something gets you off and you can access it whats the fuckin problem. Just shut up and bust

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

shut up and bust

Underrated song tbh

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Having sex with women used to be good. Now it feels bad. What is going on?" live-tucker-reaction

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] naom3@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where are they even getting that quote from? I looked at the source they cited and it doesn’t seem to be in there. Did they just make it up? Was this written by chatgpt?

[–] Parzivus@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I checked the source as well (can be viewed here), and it doesn't directly quote anyone, nor does it mention LGBT+ in any capacity.

[–] LeylaLove@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not sure if this will fit here, but it reminds me that one of the newest Kanye leaks is about him giving his cousin head because of porn as a kid. Written by the worst rapper of all time, Dave Blunts, of course.

[–] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I refuse to tolerate this Dave Blunts slander

[–] LeylaLove@hexbear.net 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Listen to that song and tell me he isn't hilariously bad

[–] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 1 points 6 days ago

It's so bad it overflows into being good

load more comments
view more: next ›