this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
96 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12081 readers
475 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

for profit healthcare… and idea by the devil only well received by sociopaths

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's capitalism, stupid!

[–] Andonyx@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can anyone with a medical background explain how DONATING can lead to an adverse reaction?

Is it to do with plasma donations specifically vs. whole blood?

I'm confused and curious.

[–] RustySharp@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No medical background, but a regular donor here. Plasma donations involve taking your blood out, separating the plasma, and returning everything else in a continuous process.

This other article about one of the victims indicated that the machine issued 5 high-pressure alerts about this return process, all of which were ignored.

It's not unusual to get an alert or two. Sometimes there's a kink in the tubing, or an improperly positioned needle. Sometimes I fall asleep and the pressure drops.

Properly trained staff should know by the nature and frequency of the alerts to terminate the process. In that particular incident, even the machine told them to terminate, but was ignored.

[–] Andonyx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah gotcha! thanks, I didn't realize there was a "return" stream.

[–] RustySharp@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There's only one needle. So the machine works in multiple suck-return cycles (separation happens simultaneously during return). Roughly every 5-10 minutes. The final return will include a bag of saline to replace the plasma they took.

Which is why one or two warnings are not usually a major concern, as long as the following cycles are okay. But usually after 3 (in my personal experience), they just say, "not your day, come back in two weeks hey?"

[–] Andonyx@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's interesting. is a one-needle cycle better than say a two needle loop for safety or efficiency?

[–] RustySharp@programming.dev 3 points 21 hours ago

From the receiving end of the needle, having two streams would likely double the chance of errors happening. Even the best phlebotomist has a bad day. Also, veins often move when you try to stab them.

Not to mention any blood-related equipment are single-use. So the needle, tubes, containers, they all go to a special bin (I hope to be recycled). Doubling up would unnecessarily increase the cost/effort.

I would highly recommend going to your nearest centre and learn by donating yourself! 😀

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it's more about shoddy training and oversight of the staff.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

That's what the article mentions

issues with training, proper procedures not being followed

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

It would be interesting to know which other organizations are handling plasma donations. It sounds like there are other private providers, but, aside from the one bought by Grifols, they aren't mentioned.

Similarly, it'd be interesting to know what percentage of these procedures Grifols is responsible for. They're responsible for 25/27 reported incidents, but did they do 99.99% of procedures or 10%?

The other two reactions were reported by Héma-Québec, a non-profit organization, the regulator said. Héma-Québec told CBC it actually reported three during this period.

Good guy HQ being honest.