839
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mercano@lemmy.world 247 points 4 months ago

Man is stuck between a rock and a hard place. He doesn’t want to make this election a referendum on abortion, because as we’ve seen in ballot measures in the past two years, he can’t win that fight. However, his base won’t accept anything but a hardline stance. Must suck to be him, couldn’t happen to a worse person.

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 75 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Same situation where he was almost begging his cult to take the vaccine. You can see him share how important it was, realizing they were gonna lynch him, and immediately kept twisting it over and over until he was on their side again.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 64 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If he hadn't politicized it in the first place it would've been ok, but he saw the blue cities being hit first and so it was initially a benefit because people voting against him were dying. Then his big dumdum a-brain couldn't extrapolate to the future where eventually only people against science would be dying, so he came out against protections. By the time the he realized his cult was dying off it was far too late for them to change their personalities.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago

While this is all true, I do want to clarify. He was always for the vaccine. Because you take the vaccine and then the problem goes away.

He was always against masking and social distancing, because that hurts the Dow Jones Industrial Average. He cared more about the S&P 500 than he did about the American people.

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Moreover as Fauci recounts, tiny hands wanted it to be just like the seasonal flu that 'in a few months just goes away'.

His idiot brain wanted it gone by obfuscation and denial.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 30 points 4 months ago

He put himself there. Remember that in 2012 he was pretty waffley on abortion and then he listened to the Christian nationals and stuffed to court with people who wanted to kill Roe. Whether he is truly drinking the Kool-Aide (personally I don't think Trump gives a shit about anything as long as he gets money and fame) or not he is now committed to a position that 70% of Americans disagree with. The fact that Dems aren't knocking it out of the fucking park (we're moving in the right direction finally, at least) is a pretty clear sign that America is sick and tired of neoliberalism and wants actual change.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 141 points 4 months ago

You shouldn’t have to file a police report or be seriously ill to get an abortion. Fuck the GOP’s stance on abortion.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 66 points 4 months ago

That’s Trump’s stance on abortion. GOP stance is: you’re not an American if you support ANY abortion publicly.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

probably not even his stance on abortion.

"Yeah... i support exceptions for, uh, rape, and stuff... ". the boos were because he didn't make the winking obvious enough for the troglodytes in the back.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 months ago

He’s been on the record in the past fully supporting abortion; I believe it’s a service family members of his have used more than once.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 117 points 4 months ago

The crowd: "We love rape and incest"

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 53 points 4 months ago

How else do you expect them to procreate???!?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

I wonder how hard a horse would have to kick my skull before I thought the government should assist pedophiles in harming their victims. They hate women so much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 84 points 4 months ago
[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

I'll bet you've seen some shit

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago

Neck vaginas, people fuckin couches. It's a wild world

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 242@lemmy.cafe 75 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This is what happens when you pander to extremists, donnie. You now have the choice of pissing off the nutjobs by trying to appeal to the moderates, or you can double down on the nutjobs. You lose either way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 66 points 4 months ago

Dementia Don the racist rapist with 34 felonies that can't complete a coherent sentence can't remember what his cult wants. He needs to drop out, he's just too old.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 66 points 4 months ago

He's probably paid for an abortion in a case of rape and incest.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 4 months ago

We have court records alleging almost as much. It was a kid on Epstein's Island.

[-] meliaesc@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 4 months ago

With campaign money.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Drusas@kbin.run 57 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

On the one hand, I love to see him booed and I'm sure it actually had an impact on the narcissist. On the other hand, the booers could hardly have chosen a worse stance.

Degenerates is right. You have to be a degenerate to believe that a 10-year-old should have her uncle's rape baby.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

... I mean we're talking about the people who probably are the uncles who raped a child.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] t0m5k1@lemmy.world 56 points 4 months ago

America, you are a seriously screwed up nation.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 53 points 4 months ago

This is probably why he has been so hesitant on making campaign promises this time around.

If he takes up a stand other than "dems are bad", he risks dividing his fanbase.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Well his issue is that he has been saying shit to appease his cult and they took a turn for straight up fascism, and then his issue is that the coup failed and he is no longer in power and that maga cult is simply not big enough to get him elected, he has to take some more reasonable stances to attract the "normal" republicans, but then those somewhat normal views are too fucking extreme for his maga cult so he is in risk of losing them if he says stuff like this, he is kinda fucked

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

Why doesn't he just do the classics which they all agree on? Promises of overt bigotry and being financially cucked by billionaires always work great on Repubs.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MattW03@lemmy.ca 51 points 4 months ago

Just in case someone truly believe that all this s**tshow would just disappear without Trump around. Let's face it, he's a symptom of the problem, not the main cause.

[-] rsuri@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

The abortion shitshow isn't about Trump, but the neo-monarchism shitshow is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] XipArchivedXenia@lemmy.world 46 points 4 months ago

i don't understand why people are still anti-abortion in general, but even for those who are completely against it, why not allow it in extreme cases like medical reasons, rape, and incest? surely your god wouldn't want a young girl raped by her father to give birth to her own child-sibling who's definitely going to be all kinds of genetically and mentally fucked up?

[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 4 months ago

Honest answer? Yeah, many of them would. Because God doesn't make mistakes and it must therefore be God's plan.

Why is rape part of God's plan but abortion isn't? No clue, beats me.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 19 points 4 months ago

It's all part of God's plan? It's either all or not all, so which is it?

Expecting critical thinking supported faith is a waste of time ;-)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sandbox@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago

Because they believe that women should be subordinate to men, and that their sexuality should be tightly controlled. For the same reason, they want to make it harder to get divorced.

It has never been about religion, that’s just a smokescreen. it’s just control over women.

[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

The Lord works in mysterious ways. Or some other bullshit they tell themselves to justify the horrors of the world. The Lord is almighty. No, fuck you, the "lord" does not exist, you imbecile.

[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

"Christians" didn't give two shits about abortion until integrating schools became a thing in the South. Then, suddenly, we care about the "unborn."

Just gonna leave this here:

"The unborn are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus, but actually dislike people who breathe. Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.”

  • Pastor David Barnhart
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 44 points 4 months ago

Your ONLY allowed to kill Children AFTER they've been Born! That's why these SAME people are TOTALLY COOL with Guns in Schools and Calling in Bomb Threats to Children's Hospital's and Outlawing Youth Medicine and Defunding School Lunches!

[-] eclipse@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He created that monster. It’s his own fault if they eat him alive- because I guarantee you, they’re going to get far worse and they’ll turn on him in a fucking second if he even so much as glances to the left.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Glances to the slightly less far right you mean?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago

I have to commend these vile shitbags with being consistent about hating women and wanting them to be miserable incubators.

Other "moderate" regressives who find that far too cruel to impose on somebody need to get a fucking clue what team they are backing. Supporting abortion for rape and incest is inconsistent with pretending a fetus is a human. There are no crimes a father can commit where it is morally acceptable to execute a child.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

Floundering for a platform when the only platform they had, “fuck Biden”, was suddenly pulled out from under them. Now they don’t know what to do.

[-] some_guy 22 points 4 months ago

You really have to be full of hate to take such a position. Wtf.

Hey, you know what's cool? Traumatizing victims of trauma!

[-] sparkle@lemm.ee 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The Republicans are getting cannibalized by their own voterbase. They've pushed their voters too far to the right, and now it's coming back to bite them in the ass. Whatever plausibly "moderate" views red politicians have now are going to be gone in a few years, if the Democrats winning the upcoming elections doesn't save them lol

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 21 points 4 months ago

Just a reminder that the only sensible way to determine if a pregnancy was caused by rape is to ask the woman.

If you're pro-rape-exception, you're pro choice.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] zyratoxx@lemm.ee 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 4 months ago

Scrolling by quickly, the thumbnail in my Lemmy client makes it look like he's got a hitler mustache. The framing of the microphone and his hand is almost perfect and very fitting.

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 18 points 4 months ago

Hypothetically, what about any prostitute you happen to get pregnant?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 months ago

Trump: I don't want to be financially responsible for my rape babies.

Crowd: boo!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
839 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19181 readers
1828 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS