Does Donald Trump really want to be a dictator? (theconversation.com)

submitted 4 months ago by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@lemmy.world

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 99 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Well, let's see.

He has been surrounding himself with and replacing people in positions of power with people based on loyalty alone in all branches of the government including the military,
He has tried to overthrow the results of an election through violent means and said he will do it again
He gets rid of anyone who dares to contradict him
He divides the population against itself
He called out for political violence against his opponents
He floated the idea of getting rid of the two mandates cap for himself
He expressed the intent of jailing his opponents on multiple occasions
He said that if he wins next election voting won't be necessary anymore
He openly admitted he wants to be a dictator on multiple occasions....

Beats me. It's anyone's guess.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 30 points 4 months ago

Let’s ask Mike Pence

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

He expresses admiration for other dictators.

[-] JackDark@lemmy.world 57 points 4 months ago

Yes

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Please give KyleVapor my regards.

[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 53 points 4 months ago

Yes FFS. Why are you still asking this question at this point? Couldn't figure it out after he successfully got Scotus to rule in favor of criminal immunity for presidents?

[-] Hazzia@infosec.pub 25 points 4 months ago

I'm concerned for anyone who had doubts after Jan 6

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 7 points 4 months ago

"Jan 6 wasn't a real insurrection! They didn't even have guns!"

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Why are you still asking this question at this point?

Because the question in the headline is the propaganda meant to make people doubt the answer

[-] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 50 points 4 months ago

I'm going to be a dictator on day one!

But... Does he really want to be a dictator? Hmm, we'll never know... Guess we'll just have to find out in January 🤷

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

TBF he said hed be a dictator only until things are fixed. And im SUUUURE he will give up his power with ease

[-] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

He said he'd fix things, so that in another 4 years, his "beautiful Christians" won't have to vote again.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago

Yes.

Yes he does.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago

Let’s see - voting system gerrymandered to the point that minority rule is a factor. A political party exerts every possible pressure to make voting more difficult, onerous, or to expel registered voters from the registry, especially those in contested areas or favoring the opposition. Sending false electors to invalidate an election. Calling elected leaders on the phone to falsify vote counts. Literally attempting a coup to overturn an election.

Then the multiple times trump has directly or indirectly stated he wants to be a dictator and cement his/his family’s position in essentially a hereditary dictatorship of the country.

But does he really mean it?

[-] Foni@lemm.ee 27 points 4 months ago

The issue isn't whether Donald the Duck wants to be a dictator—it’s clear that he does. It's also evident that his supporters are aware of this. The real question is why so many Americans feel so let down by their political system that they're willing to tear it down completely.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Because they keep voting against their own interests? Because they’re gullible fools manipulated by outrage headlines? Because they aren’t able to understand the consequences of their votes?

I try to understand, I try to find common ground, but all I see is someone in a horror movie standing in an open grave wondering if they’re trapped but won’t stop digging.

[-] Foni@lemm.ee -3 points 4 months ago

If you really believe that such a large percentage of Americans vote to end democracy because they are idiots, then you don't believe in democracy either.

And that is what will do more than anything to end it, to make neither side believe that it is the least bad of the systems.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yep, both sides the same. Voting for universal healthcare and achieving it, is the same as voting against and having hundreds of thousands without. Voting to respect everyone’s reproductive rights is the same as trying to control other people’s choices. Voting to improve education is the same as starving education. And most of all not understanding people’s poor choices is exactly the same as treason and election fraud

[-] Foni@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

You haven't understood me. I'm not talking about specific policies and which ones are better; I'm talking about the very foundations of democracy. In a democracy, those in power are chosen by the majority. If you believe that the majority (or close to it) is idiotic, how can you believe that democracy is better than other systems? In your own response, you make it clear that you think your ideas are better and should be implemented regardless of whether they convince people or whether the majority wants them. How can you call yourself a democrat in those circumstances?

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

That’s a really big stretch, even before complaining about the electoral college, nor did I focus on my ideas but listening to the candidates, watching actual behaviors, accepting reality

[-] Foni@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

But it's much simpler than that. Do you believe that decisions made by the majority of citizens are legitimate and valid even if they go against your ideas, yes or no? If the answer is yes, it doesn't matter if your ideas are to raise or lower taxes; it doesn't matter if your ideas are for healthcare for all or none. You believe in democracy, and then we'll decide which team you're on and whether it's 'better' or 'worse' ethically.

I'm not from the USA, but from the outside, it seems like there are a lot of people who don't accept decisions unless they align with their ideas, no matter how much popular support they have. And those ideas can be great (and may align with mine), but imposing them is never a good idea.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You’re putting words in my mouth that I never said

[-] Foni@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Sorry if it gave you that impression, sometimes my English is limited

[+] StThicket@reddthat.com -11 points 4 months ago

Probably because they are feeling like the electoral system is not working for them at the moment. Sometimes you need to tear it down completely in order to build it up properly. Trump seems to be the perfect candidate to fuck it all up, before someone else can take over the wheel.

[-] Foni@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago

Be careful with those types of ideas "we have to tear down the system and anyone who tears it down is worth it" no, if Trump ruins everything, whoever comes after him is not going to fix it, at least not in the way you imagine. Believe me, in Europe we have seen those kinds of ideas before

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah when my car is running poorly I usually put a brick on the gas pedal and drive it into a tree then light it on fire. It’s the perfect way to stop having a poorly running car.

[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

That's not how that works. You don't end up with a blank slate, you end up with a fascist shithole with no guarantee of it ever being unfucked.

[-] MySkinIsFallingOff@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Accelerationism

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

He said he'll be dictator for a day. Is that like "just the tip"?

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah it’s just to see how it feels, that’s all, nothing serious, this is fine, everything is fine, we’re all fine here

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

Yes. The answer is yes.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes but in Spanish.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Olé!

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

With milk?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Yup.

[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

He wants to become president to stay out of prison, first and foremost.

He also wants what Putin has... so yes. He's wants to be a dick- traitor.

[-] danekrae@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

Everybody knows that. Good thing people and media keeps giving him publicity.

I expected the 5:1article ratio for the candidates to change, when Harris took over. But it's too late for the shit hole country.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

Trump = clicks = money

There is no corporate journalism, there is corporate profit seeking. That's all that exists.

[-] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Yes

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Short answer is yes. The longer answer is yyyyyyeeeeeeeeessssss!!!

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

In the posted picture above, his head is blocking the letter “K”

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Fuck your clickbait - he's old, he's weird and he literally said "I want to be a dictator"

There's no "play" in that word, no interpretation to be had, no reading between the lines. Fuck this website.

[-] rhythmisaprancer@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 4 months ago

It has been mentioned in the past that he has skeletons in his closet. What better way to deal with them than to be the one who can cast them off?

[-] Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

[-] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

This is one of the few times where Betteridge's law of headlines does not apply.

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

He does.

[-] TheBigBrother@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Does you need a sarcasm detector?

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024

98 points (83.6% liked)

politics

19241 readers

1678 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News