this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
166 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

442 readers
444 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] egs81t@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

Why does that sound like NTFs or Blockchain? Or is it just a usb stick?

[–] Future_Honkey@hexbear.net 19 points 6 days ago

Chat is this real? Even my dumbass knows you don't get rid of the physical backups

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 16 points 6 days ago

We migrated the tape backups to a Vercel app!

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 13 points 6 days ago

Converted all our files to Adobe suite format for accessibility and ease of use

[–] kittin@hexbear.net 112 points 1 week ago

Just saved $800 by converting 4 rubber tires (137 yr old technology) to driving on my rims

[–] Palacegalleryratio@hexbear.net 111 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Magnetic tapes are modern ‘permanent’ digital storage - they’re often used for long term archiving and backups. After decades of development and refinement it’s extremely reliable and relatively inexpensive. So I very much doubt that there will actually be long term savings. But we all know that’s not really the point of Doge so I guess who cares.

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was gonna say this, I've set up tape archiving system for companies in the past, they're very cheap, stable, and easy to maintain. They absolutely are the right, modern choice for a lot of long-term data archival use cases.

I'm guessing 'permanent modern digital record' means they uploaded it all into the cloud, where they will have to change it regularly due to updates, frequently lose access to it all after a datacentre outage, and soon get price gouged so they're paying far, far more.

[–] sodium_nitride@hexbear.net 90 points 1 week ago

I love how he has 0 understanding of things even tech laymen know.

[–] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 86 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow! A million dollars?! Now we'll be able to fire another...half of a Tomahawk missile mission-accomplished

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

porky-happy What a coincidence, the price of a missile just went up by that exact amount

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 79 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The team of tape archivists at my office will be glad to hear that they can be replaced by a USB HDD.

[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 48 points 1 week ago

You joke but there's a non insignificant chance some Management sees this and orders the same thing to be done

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 73 points 1 week ago (1 children)

good news guys, we stored all the government data on aws

[–] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't wait to see that s3 bucket in the next few months

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago

It's going to be either billions or zero dollars

[–] Des@hexbear.net 65 points 1 week ago (4 children)

hold on i thought old fashion tape drives were in fact still very reliable and have insanely high capacity for data you don't need to access much or quickly?

[–] fox@hexbear.net 31 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Magnetic tape drives have the lowest per-terabyte cost of any digital storage medium and will typically function for 15-30 years

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 6 days ago

Well yeah but why would you store something in a facility you control on hardware you own when you could host it in the cloud?

[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 40 points 1 week ago

Absolutely, they have proven long-term reliability, and great data density.

[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 week ago

You would be correct

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 58 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did they put it on the blockchain

[–] kleeon@hexbear.net 47 points 1 week ago

they uploaded it to google drive and then forgot the password

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Huh, weird I smell the library of Alexandria burning again

[–] TheSpectreOfGay@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

yea i imagine all of this information has been or will be shortly lost

[–] Hohsia@hexbear.net 10 points 6 days ago

Ignorance when it comes to the internet is just miles and leagues worse than you can possibly imagine. I’m convinced that musk hasn’t thought about data retention for 20 years if not longer. “Permanent modern digital records?” There’s no fucking way

With a dash of Sunday scaries anxiety, below I channel my inner UlyssesT (may he rest in peace)

spoiler

Of course I would miss my precious hexagonal bear, but it would be a net good if a foreign actor dismantled the west’s flimsy network architecture in an unprecedented cyber attack and forced people outside once again. We’re all miserable whether we admit it or not (this is quite the take and I can defend it if someone feels strongly against it but I think people might know what I’m talking about) and have no company outside of emulating it in the most constrained and toxic digital pods which are a copy and paste of the environment depicted in the Matrix. If that wasn’t bad enough, we’re removing all likelihood of anything hinting at Socratic dialogue by firmly keeping people placated by their echo chambers, filled to the brim with numerous algorithmic systems tokenizing and manipulating our brain chemistry on the fly. We’re then wrapping all of this up in stolen data to train systems which require the same resources we need to survive.

This is a reality that would leave Vonnegut wishing he never would have existed

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago

Maybe this is just a way for them to hide shit by "accedentally" losing it

[–] TheSpectreOfGay@hexbear.net 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

what

why would that make you save money

what

[–] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Keeping tape records in a warehouse is really cheap! That is the entire point of them. Also the fact that they are very reliable.

[–] TheSpectreOfGay@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yea im confused where they got the number from, but they probably just pulled it out of their ass

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

You can store 50PB of tape data in a warehouse and service all the warehouse, labor, and equipment for $1M/year. Meanwhile you can store 5TB of data in an S3 bucket for a year for the same price.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tapes are not only better for long term storage but it's just way cooler too

[–] copandballtorture@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But you gotta pay a maintenance technician to store them, which is completely unreasonable to the kids that pirated all their software and are now running the government

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 18 points 6 days ago

Yeah, hate to have highly skilled professionals do important work.

[–] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 16 points 6 days ago

I-was-saying I'm a kid who pirates all my software and I want archival tape...

[–] Sibshops@lemm.ee 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They've been switching from tapes to optical storage long before Elon. The money figure is made up, however.

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago (6 children)

optical? is that supposed to be more durable? last i knew cds and dvds had a pretty miserable shelf-life

[–] GeneralSwitch2Boycott@hexbear.net 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The problem with DVDs at least is they use an organic compound for the dye in the reflective disc backing or whatever that slowly breaks down but I believe blu-rays don't. Only issue for BDs is if they're manufactured incorrectly.

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 3 points 6 days ago

yeah.. i remember being told never to store long-term data on cd-r dvd-rs way back in the early 2000s for the photostudio i was working at because the data would likely be corrupted within 10 - 15 years for most of the discs due to breakdown of the chemicals with time

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

he's probably stored it on NVME drives because he uses it in his gaming PC (that he definitely didnt get someone else to build)

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

70 years old? It must be inefficient. very-smart

Government should just save $1B per year by converting 26 characters (1200 year old alphabet) to prmnnt mdrn txt spk.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago

I was gonna say something cute like how much are they spending to upgrade to save the money on maintenance but then I realized I don't actually care.

Throwing 200 years of archived data into s3 to ~~train LLMs~~ own the libs

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago

DOGE is pleased to announce that we have saved the tax payers 5 million dollars spent 20 years ago by converting the written constitution (6000 year old technology for information storage) to permanent modern TikToks.

[–] heatenconsumerist@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

Boys, I think I just accidentally deleted the entire "sell to government" google doc

[–] buh@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

they zipped it up and threw it on big balls' minecraft server

load more comments
view more: next ›