this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
524 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

20497 readers
1177 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 72 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] vrojak@feddit.org 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless the mole just doesn't have hair on its face or ass or somewhere, then it's possible to comb all hairs flat.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless the mole just doesn't have hair on its face or ass or somewhere, then it's possible to comb all hairs flat.

That is the case, it has bald patches around its mouth and, uh, hands. I don't want to look up pictures of mole ass, but I can’t imagine the anus itself is hairy, that would be a biohazard trap in the environment moles live in.

[–] four@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, I'm glad I don't live in the environment the moles live in then...

I did not need to know that, but I respect the witty way you communicated it

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

I knew someone would beat me to it.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, a mole is basically a donut. Sooo…

Claims like that and the actions following from them is why I'm currently in litigation with the Dunkin' franchise of Tightsqueeze, Virginia.

It doesn't help that they also insist that "mole blood is basically coffee"..

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago
[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There is a similar rule applying to haha well. lets justr say.

[–] Rose_Thorne@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who up strokin' their mole?

[–] notoftenthat@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Irish equivalent to cranking your hog?

Eta- the Bingalator understands me

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I;m thinkin bout jean bean ramsey

Just chilling here while stroking my mole.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This rubs me the wrong way.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 year ago

Now we know you're not a mole

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unless it is either perfectly perpendicular to the skin or is already somehow laying in all directions: There can only be one direction. Given a mole moves in tight spaces backwards and forward, both would make sense.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Maybe their fur is like a sequin sweater

[–] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No really, this is a real quality mole fur has

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is a mathematical problem with no solution, there has to be a cowlick on a sphere. Perhaps the mole avoids this problem by not being a sphere, where there is a possible solution

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

It's very short and perpendicular to the skin. It feels like velvet.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

But it’s not completely covered in fur. A partially hairy sphere doesn’t need a cowlick.

[–] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dont remember learning about moles in math. Chemistry, yes, but I don't think moles care much about topology.

However, if we assume an ideal mole in empty space with no air resistance, we would see how they have this property: their hair follicles would, in the absence of outside interference, stand straight up. So, its technically more accurate to say that every direction of petting a mole is equally wrong.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Someone else covered it in another reply, but moles have bald areas. Hairy Ball only applies when it's entirely covered.

Edit: other comment

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Cowlick doesn't go against what the post is saying

Their hair can lay in any direction at anytime

It's not saying that you can make their hair all perfect in any direction.

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A topological sphere so unless moles are actually a torus then it's still not possible.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good news, vertebrates are tori

[–] PaintedSnail@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unless they wear a whig.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

they are however usually not hairy on the inside

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

On a wild Tiger you can do it, but only one time.

[–] skrlet13@feddit.cl 8 points 1 year ago

We can make moles happy petting them, there is not wrong way... How wholesome...

[–] kubica@fedia.io 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the mole is trying to trick you to try it.

[–] corvidenjoyer@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

But its so tempting...

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The same is true about sharks.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Quite the opposite:

  1. Sharks don't have fur
  2. Shark skin is rough is one direction and smooth in the other. This allows them to get friction with the water to drive themselves forward, but the glide through the water for efficient travel.

The idea was copied into competitive swim suits.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, you're wrong. Sharks are silky smooth in all directions.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/shark-skin-inspired-materials-have-a-long-way-to-go-before-they-work-like-the-real-thing-180980973/

Few people have gotten close enough to a shark to pet it. If you could run your hand from a shark’s head to its tail—not that you should—it would feel smooth, almost like suede. Reverse direction and it’s rough like sandpaper. Viewed under a microscope, shark skin is composed of ribbed, dragonesque scales layered over each other like shingles on a roof. These structures, called dermal denticles, are more like teeth than skin

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The link you posted says sharks are smooth as the finest silk in every direction.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You sound like you are trying to trick people into getting their skin rasped off by sharks.