this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
732 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

19344 readers
2242 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 89 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Also angles

Would love to hear how mass is measured in seconds though

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Set G = 1 and c =1. Then equations like r = 2m make dimensional sense.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometrized_unit_system

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 57 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My brother, that explanation is not nearly dumbed down enough and as with most math wiki is useless for eli5 stuff.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think a lot of people understand the concept of light-seconds, which can measure distance in seconds.

Allow me to introduce the gravity-second. 1 gravity-second of mass-energy is enough mass-energy to have a Schwarzchild radius of 2 light-seconds.

[–] pythonoob@programming.dev 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying but am still too dumb to understand it lol

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Size of a black hole.

Certain mass = certain distance

Distance = seconds

Therefore mass = seconds

[–] uis@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Then I don't even want to be in same solar system with millisecond heavy object.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

You most certainly don't, that's a radius of about 300km (186 miles) and a mass of 101 suns.

Even if you meant microsecond, that's 1/10 of the sun, and would be very disruptive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 45 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] cafeinux@infosec.pub 29 points 2 years ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago

Rocket scientists be like:

Fuel efficiency: seconds.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Wait, how do you measure mass in seconds?

[–] ScampiLover@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Time taken for me to eat that mass of hotdogs

Choking_Hazard.txt

[–] reinei@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just as particle physicists measure everything in energy (eV to be precise...)

Mass? eV Energy? eV Distance? 1/eV Time? Guess what: 1/eV as well! This also means velocity has unit 1...

And the worst part: it turns out to be extremely useful!

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why is the astrophysicist wearing gloves? Is he trying to dispose of a body?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fun fact: Seconds are called seconds because the first breakdown of an hour is the minute, and the second breakdown is the second. Don't ask me the obvious question(s) because I don't know.

[–] f314@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If by obvious question you mean “why is it called a minute,” that is because “minute” means “small.” So you have the first minute (small) part and the second minute part of the hour.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Mass in seconds? How? I get mass in Joules, but seconds?

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

There are two possibilities I can think of:

  • Orbit duration can be used to calculate mass
  • The diameter of a star or the parallax distance on the sky (in arcseconds) can also be used to evaluate mass
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 7 points 2 years ago

I measure the mass of my stool by seconds it takes to discharge

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Me: not smart enough to understand

Brain: Quick! Say something to sound like you fit in!

Me: uh ... I just did the Kessel Run in under 12 parsecs!

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But do you remember the Krebs Cycle?

[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

!https://i.ytimg.com/vi/27x0wiuTYoE/maxresdefault.jpg

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 20 points 2 years ago

I'm hungry for more; may I have seconds?

[–] observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That may be relativists (they would actually measure anything in units of mass, with everything else defined through G = c = 1). Astrophysicists commonly measure mass in solar masses, long distances in parsec (or kiloparsec, megaparsec), short distances in solar radii or AU, and time in whatever is relevant to their problem (could be seconds or gigayears)

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

short distances in solar radii

I think astrophycisists and I may have a difference of opinion on the meaning of the adjective short

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

As a theoretical physicist, units are for chumps

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's easy to remember c and ℏ if they're both 1...

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago

Constance? Never heard of her

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] drail@fedia.io 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Everything should just be in eV. Particle physics natural units are the best.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] uis@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Rads. But radians are fine too.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Tau (τ). A full circle is just 1τ instead of 2π.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] montechristo@feddit.org 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If you ever find yourself among theoretical physicists and/or astrophysicists and need a conversation starter, just ask about unit systems or unitless/natural measurement systems. There is no other profession that is more obsessed about that topic.

Just to put this here:

ħ=1

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Don't they measure distance and time by redshift (ie colour)

[–] Generous1146@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What even is color if not seconds^-1?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They normally use parallax-seconds, i.e. parsecs, for long distance objects.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Please Sir, can I have some more?

Lash him! Ridicule him! This boy wants seconds!

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sounds like that reduces to hertz, which I'm sure they'll just express in seconds.

[–] tallricefarmer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 years ago

They like to set the speed of light to be 1. That is dimensionless 1. It makes their calculations simpler this way instead of dragging some power of c everywhere like a loosely connected trailer on a dirt road.

When i took a particle physics class we measured everything in energy (eV). In this case of measuring everything in seconds, acceration would be measured in units of 1/s

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 4 points 2 years ago

Can I get a conversation table?

load more comments
view more: next ›