this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
284 points (98.0% liked)

News

38443 readers
1947 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 92 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

While the Supreme Court rules against a Rastafarian for his religion in the same week.

They're really sending a message about which religion gets protection.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This one really pisses me off.

The guy brought in a printout of the controlling fifth circuit opinion that was directly applicable to him, and the prison guards literally threw the court order in the trash before trashing his constitutional rights.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Well, he chose the wrong religion to have any religious freedom.

The Nat-C's think that religious freedom just means choosing the "right" denomination of xtianity and definitely don't believe in actual religious freedom which would require a separation of church and state, which they absolutely deny.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

GD that's even worse than I thought it would be. What kind of crazy ass cognitive dissonance is it to say it's unfortunate, even illegal, but no, there will be no consequences for violating this law.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

It's not cognitive dissonance, it's hate and cruelty.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I guess some religions are more equal than others.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes, absolutely what the Seven Mountain Mandate Nat-C's want. You have the "religious freedom" to "choose" between a narrow set of xtian sects.

Everything else is suspect and anyone choosing something else is to be treated like second class citizens, if not outright persecuted.

People in the "right" xtians sects are to be granted unwarranted privilege and and put on pedestals, as it was before.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 60 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Good, there's no stronger driver of atheism than being forced to read boring canaanite fan fiction.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

They are also changing the social studies program to promote christian nationalism while promoting islamphobia so no farthest from good.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MrGeneric@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

Right? Id be fine with Bible studies in schools if dan mcclellan taught it

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Add it to the huge and ever-growing pile of "reasons to not live in Texas". Hopefully Texans have enough of this bullshit and kick out the clowns responsible for this. But given how voters are being disenfranchised in many parts of the country, that's very unlikely.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago

They're hoping the Supreme Court takes this case. Texas has tried this before and it was struck down. I'm not so sure it will be struck down again.

[–] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you kidding me they're the dumbest amongst us, they won't change.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

As someone living in Texas, I agree.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 37 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Doesn’t the first clause of the first amendment say the government shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion?

I guess Texas can’t read.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They can't read but they can sure tell you some Bible stories.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

Well, the lines that give them excuses to hate people at least.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Texas fought two wars to preserve slavery. One against Mexico, and one against The Union.

[–] some_guy 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The Supreme Court has already ruled against this. The point is to let this corrupt court reverse that ruling.

[–] Spooge@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

If they let this stand I would be motivated to be violent

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 16 points 3 weeks ago

Can parents exempt their children from this? Because they already let them avoid sex education and anything that might not be hetero.

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Bold of you to assume America's public school students are still capable of reading.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrMeanJavaBean@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

The American Taliban

[–] LucidNightmare@anarchist.nexus 13 points 3 weeks ago

Ya’ll Queda strikes again

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

On the plus side, forcing middle-schoolers to actually read the Bible is a great way to get them to hate it. The Bible is... not exactly an enjoyable reading experience, and that's coming from someone who loves to read. You think this is going to be anything but torture for today's TikTok-brain kids?

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Good. Kids should know things like Ezekiel 23:20

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses."

I'm sure these kids are destined to come across horsecock porn if they haven't already.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's Texas, that's one of their first Google searches /j

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Everything's bigger in Texas?

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Teacher should make a whole thing of teaching them the original languages of each passage, and also the Latin Vulgate so they'll get something useful out of it.

[–] otterpop@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Not gonna lie if I had the opportunity to learn Hebrew, Koine Greek, Aramaic and Latin in school that would have been amazing. Where I live, it was only Spanish

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Latin

All the better for demon-summoning incantations. And just freaking people the fuck out.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Latin and Ancient Greek were fun for a cumulated 3 minutes before I realised how unrelated those are to any of young-me interests. And it was a 2 or 3 years ride…

[–] otterpop@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What about old you? I've always thought reading the classics in their mother tongue would be great!

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Sure. I learned english largely to be able to read OG Pratchet & Tolkien. Old Greek & Latin I have actually zero interest into most of it. Maybe if that's your thing it would be great but in that case nothing it preventing you to learn old language whenever. Young-me had no choice - those were mandatory at school.

[–] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

In the "highest(?)" secondary school called, Gymnasium in the Netherlands you still have to take years of both Greek and Latin. My son hated ever second of it, but it's fun my wife can still read a tiny bit of modern Greek.

[–] LemmyBruceLeeMarvin@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

It's okay I'm sure they'll focus on the passage about the rich getting into heaven as likely as a camel going through a needles eye and all that chasing money changers from the temple

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn't Mythology required reading in many states? How is this different? (ducks)

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago

Actually ducks don't appear too often in mythology too much. Swans do though, if you are in a myth and a swan appears just run it's probably Zeus and he is fully intending to commit sexual assault.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 3 weeks ago

They did the specifically to get sued. Then they can claim their being attacked by the left/woke/lgbt/athiest/satinist/bogeyman and make a bunch of noise when (if but probably when) it's ruled unconstitutional. It's become their MO; do something blatantly illegal, then kick and scream like a toddler because you forced everybody else to sue to strike it down. The assholes get to brag that they did something to protect religious freedom, or cultural values, or family protection, or some such shit, and then they get to make a lot of noise in the press when they get knocked on their ass for it. Then while the people who actually care about the law are busy fighting that they can repeat the process two or three more times. It's sisyphian bullshit and I hate it.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Reading doesn't mean understanding. If I had children in Texas, I'd encourage them to ask questions over and over.

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 weeks ago

Critical thinking is the problem they're trying to solve.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But the ones pushing the law didn't read the bible.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

No but Jesus will forgive them if they force it on our kids

load more comments
view more: next ›